Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
2.
Eur J Oncol Nurs ; 61: 102207, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2104849

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The covid-19 global pandemic has impacted on nurses who have rapidly adapted to new ways of working, and experienced negative impacts due to over-stretched services. Two surveys captured the experiences of lung cancer and mesothelioma specialist nurses in the United Kingdom (UK) in 2020, but the impact of later stages of the pandemic was unknown. This study aimed to explore the impact of covid-19 on lung Cancer and mesothelioma nurses since January 2021, the second wave of the pandemic. METHODS: An online cross-sectional survey with both open and closed questions explored the impact of covid-19 on ways of working and workload, quality of care, and health and wellbeing. The survey was open to UK based lung cancer and mesothelioma advanced or specialist nurses. RESULTS: 85 nurses responded to the survey. The majority were Clinical Nurse Specialists, based in England. Respondents reported changes in ways of working due to redeployment, staff shortages, and home working. Widespread adoption of virtual working practices led to concerns of negative impacts. Perceived excessive workload impacted on care with two-thirds of the sample (57, 67%) reporting they had been unable to provide the same quality of care to patients. Impacts on nurses' health and wellbeing were reported with two-thirds of the sample (56, 66%) reporting a deterioration in emotional wellbeing and mental health. Coping mechanisms employed included online team support to share experiences and increased uptake of exercise; however, impacts on lifestyle and access to coping mechanisms varied. CONCLUSION: Nurses have stepped up to the challenges of the pandemic with teamwork and innovation, but pressure arising from the pandemic and high workloads led to negative impacts on wellbeing. The authors have provided recommendations to improve patient care and support the wellbeing of nurses, which will be key to a resilient workforce living with covid-19. Whilst this study focussed on lung cancer and mesothelioma specialists, the findings have wider implications for other cancer specialties.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Mesotelioma , Enfermeras Clínicas , Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Nurs Stand ; 37(11): 44-50, 2022 11 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2056283

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Moral distress arises when a person is aware of the right course to take but is prevented from acting on it by institutional constraints. While this concept has been considered by nursing ethicists for many years, it has been particularly associated with the unprecedented healthcare conditions caused by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. AIM: To investigate the level of moral distress affecting advanced practice nurses (APNs) in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: This was a mixed-methods study in which a bespoke cross-sectional survey was sent to 243 APNs from across the UK who had been recruited to a broader longitudinal cohort study. The survey asked about their experiences, well-being and moral distress. Open-ended questions asked about their concerns regarding the health and well-being of their patients and colleagues. FINDINGS: A total of 97 APNs completed the survey, yielding a 40% response rate. Levels of moral distress were significantly higher among APNs working in secondary care (P=0.026) compared with those working in primary care. All of the respondents expressed concerns about patients due to delayed care and about the mental well-being of their colleagues, particularly those who were redeployed to COVID-19 wards. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused moral and psychological distress for APNs. However, the type of distress and its direct causes varied among these practitioners. Tailored support is required to address moral distress and subsequently improve staff retention.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Pandemias , Estudios Transversales , Estudios Longitudinales , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Principios Morales
4.
European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society ; 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2045671

RESUMEN

Purpose The covid-19 global pandemic has impacted on nurses who have rapidly adapted to new ways of working, and experienced negative impacts due to over-stretched services. Two surveys captured the experiences of lung cancer and mesothelioma specialist nurses in the United Kingdom (UK) in 2020, but the impact of later stages of the pandemic was unknown. This study aimed to explore the impact of covid-19 on lung Cancer and mesothelioma nurses since January 2021, the second wave of the pandemic. Methods An online cross-sectional survey with both open and closed questions explored the impact of covid-19 on ways of working and workload, quality of care, and health and wellbeing. The survey was open to UK based lung cancer and mesothelioma advanced or specialist nurses. Results 85 nurses responded to the survey. The majority were Clinical Nurse Specialists, based in England. Respondents reported changes in ways of working due to redeployment, staff shortages, and home working. Widespread adoption of virtual working practices led to concerns of negative impacts. Perceived excessive workload impacted on care with two-thirds of the sample (57, 67%) reporting they had been unable to provide the same quality of care to patients. Impacts on nurses’ health and wellbeing were reported with two-thirds of the sample (56, 66%) reporting a deterioration in emotional wellbeing and mental health. Coping mechanisms employed included online team support to share experiences and increased uptake of exercise;however, impacts on lifestyle and access to coping mechanisms varied. Conclusion Nurses have stepped up to the challenges of the pandemic with teamwork and innovation, but pressure arising from the pandemic and high workloads led to negative impacts on wellbeing. The authors have provided recommendations to improve patient care and support the wellbeing of nurses, which will be key to a resilient workforce living with covid-19. Whilst this study focussed on lung cancer and mesothelioma specialists, the findings have wider implications for other cancer specialties.

5.
Primary Health Care ; 32(4):30-35, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | CINAHL | ID: covidwho-1988444

RESUMEN

Why you should read this article: • To understand some of the benefits that the nursing associate role can bring to community and primary care nursing teams • To be aware of the challenges involved in training and embedding nursing associates in community and primary care settings • To recognise the need for clarity on the boundaries and expectations of the nursing associate role in community and primary care settings Nursing associates have been part of the health and social care workforce in England since 2017 and are starting to contribute to managing workforce challenges. However, little is known about the nursing associate role in community and primary care settings. This article provides an overview of what is known about the nursing associate role in community and primary care settings and introduces some emerging findings from recent research. The article identifies some of the benefits that nursing associates can bring to community and primary care nursing teams and some of the challenges involved in training and embedding nursing associates in these sectors of the health and social care workforce.

6.
Nurs Open ; 9(2): 900-907, 2022 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1700483

RESUMEN

AIM: This article describes the development and implementation of a virtual Consensus development project to address current challenges in adult nursing care in the UK. DESIGN: This is a Consensus Development Project (CDP). METHODS: The five stages of this CDP were: develop questions (informed by PPI representatives and a documentary review), generate evidence reviews, recruit and orient the lay panel, host Consensus seminars, and consult with panel members and stakeholders. RESULTS: To the best of our knowledge, a CDP has not previously been conducted in a UK nursing context, and this is the first of its kind to be hosted virtually. This article contributes a detailed outline of the Consensus development methodology and constructive commentary to support future Consensus development projects. Learning points include reflections on the impact of hosting this event virtually, the relationship between the project coordinator and chair, and the composition of the lay panel.


Asunto(s)
Investigadores , Consenso , Conferencias de Consenso como Asunto , Humanos
7.
Cancer Nursing Practice (2014+) ; : 22-28, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1449197

RESUMEN

Why you should read this article:• To improve your knowledge of mesothelioma• To familiarise yourself with the effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the healthcare of people with mesothelioma• To understand how to ensure that people with mesothelioma receive quality care and support during the COVID-19 pandemicMesothelioma is a rare, life-limiting and aggressive cancer with a high symptom burden. This article explores the effect of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the experiences of patients with mesothelioma and their carers. The charity Mesothelioma UK conducted a service evaluation that included two surveys – one with patients with mesothelioma and their carers, and the other with UK mesothelioma clinical nurse specialists – to explore the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.This article presents the results of these surveys, which suggest that patients with mesothelioma and their carers have been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in various areas. These include treatment and investigations, communication with healthcare teams, confusion concerning shielding, and the emotional and psychological burden of the pandemic. The authors include recommendations for practice to ensure patients and their families receive optimal treatment and support during the remainder of the pandemic.

8.
Lung Cancer (01695002) ; 156:S15-S16, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | Academic Search Complete | ID: covidwho-1240670
9.
Nurs Open ; 9(3): 1822-1831, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1220453

RESUMEN

AIM: To explore how the COVID-19 pandemic affected nursing associate work, training and well-being experiences. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHODS: A survey of trainee and newly qualified nursing associates was completed in July 2020. Closed responses were analysed using descriptive statistics with inferential comparisons made between community and secondary care settings. Open questions were analysed thematically. RESULTS: Sixty-four participants responded. Over half (53.2%) experienced an increased workload with 24.2% reporting extensions in their role. One third (32.3%) were redeployed, and a quarter (24.2%) did not feel safety concerns were adequately addressed when raised. Those working in the community reported significantly more concerns about staffing (p = .03), working overtime (p = .03), missed care (p = .02) and safety (p = .04). Despite this, many (75.8%) participants felt able to provide the same standards of care. Several spoke about enhanced teamwork, and the majority (96.8%) were not looking to leave their post.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Pandemias , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Recursos Humanos
10.
BMJ Open ; 11(3): e044139, 2021 03 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1138353

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to understand the experiences of advanced practice nurses (APNs) in the UK during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in relation to safety, shortages and retention. DESIGN: A cross-sectional, mixed-methods survey. SETTING: APNs in any UK setting. PARTICIPANTS: The survey was sent to an existing UK-wide cohort of APNs. 124 APNs responded (51%). RESULTS: UK-based APNs in this study reported shortages of staff (51%) and personal protective equipment (PPE) (68%) during the first 3 months of the coronavirus outbreak. Almost half (47%) had considered leaving their job over the same 3 months. Despite difficulties, there were reports of positive changes to working practice that have enhanced care. CONCLUSION: UK APNs report COVID-19-related shortages in staff and equipment across primary and secondary care and all regions of the UK. Shortages of PPE during a pandemic are known to be a factor in the development of mental health sequelae as well as a risk factor for increased turnover and retention issues. Half of APNs surveyed were considering a change in job. The UK risks a further crisis in staff morale and retention if this is not acknowledged and addressed. APNs also expressed concern about patients not receiving routine care as many specialties closed or reduced working during the crisis. However, there were also many examples of good practice, positive changes and innovation.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/provisión & distribución , Pandemias , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Salud Mental , Equipo de Protección Personal/provisión & distribución , Reino Unido/epidemiología
11.
Nurse Educ Today ; 98: 104652, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-912508

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Continuing professional development is essential for healthcare professionals to maintain and acquire the necessary knowledge and skills to provide person centred, safe and effective care. This is particularly important in the rapidly changing healthcare context of the Covid-19 pandemic. Despite recognition of its importance in the United Kingdom, minimum required hours for re-registration, and related investment, have been small compared to other countries. The aim of this review is to understand the factors that optimise continuing professional development impact for learning, development and improvement in the workplace. DESIGN: A rapid evidence review was undertaken using Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) framework; identifying a research question, developing a search strategy, extracting, collating and summarising the findings. REVIEW METHODS: In addressing the question 'What are the factors that enable or optimise CPD impact for learning, development and improvement in the workplace at the individual, team, organisation and system level?' the British Nursing Index, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, HTA database, King's Fund Library, and Medline databases were searched for key terms. A total of 3790 papers were retrieved and 39 were included. RESULTS: Key factors to optimising the impact of nursing and inter-professional continuing development are; self-motivation, relevance to practice, preference for workplace learning, strong enabling leadership and a positive workplace culture. The findings reveal the interdependence of these important factors in optimising the impact of continuing professional development on person-centred care and outcomes. CONCLUSION: In the current, rapidly changing, healthcare context it is important for educators and managers to understand the factors that enhance the impact of continuing professional development. It is crucial that attention is given to addressing all of the optimising factors in this review to enhance impact. Future studies should seek to measure the value of continuing professional development for people experiencing care, nurses and the wider organisation.


Asunto(s)
Educación Continua en Enfermería/organización & administración , Desarrollo de Personal/organización & administración , COVID-19 , Humanos , Investigación en Educación de Enfermería , Investigación en Evaluación de Enfermería , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Reino Unido/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA